A guide as NFT where each contributor becomes a co-owner of that guide (or more specifcally the NFT that represents the guide).
The number of owners of a Guide, views, etc could represent a value of the NFT
Becoming co-owner could affirm intrinsic motivation and possibly stimulate it
Consideration / risks
-----
Submitted to Project Catalyst, not expecting it to be funded this round. Needs more detail and refinement for people rate the impact, feasibility, and audibility of the project higher.
Our goal is to explore how to increase open collaboration and evolution of knowledge. We know evolving knowledge is crucial for helping us navigate change. In particular, we would like to explore the impact of receiving recognition (NFT) and in the future perhaps a reward (token) for contributing to the evolution of common knowledge.
We have created an online space (guides.co) for people to explore and collaborate on common (contextual) knowledge. People are already sharing this knowledge in live documents (a guide). Currently each guide has 1 owner and a number of admins with edit rights, plus many users contributing comments and reflections to that guide. However the problem we see is that over time the evolution of the content significantly drops in these guides (even where we are sure the content could be still relevant).
We've identified that a problem is that having only 1 author is counter productive for creating a perception of shared ownership ("why should I help if it mostly benefits him/her?'). Of course the underlying assumption is that if you share ownership over something you invest more time in it and take better care of it. A first step would be to experiment with displaying multiple owners in a guide (see mock up attached), including designing and testing a process for becoming a co-owner. With thousands of guides and counting doing this at scale requires a decentralised and trusted process. This is where we think NFTs can play a big role.
A guide as NFT - shared ownership: Become a partial owner of the guide you have contributed to.
Every document (guide) is a unique NFT with every meaningful contributor being awarded a fraction of the ownership. As more people contribute the guide becomes richer and more 'valuable' and thus your part becomes more valuable. Contributing to different guides allows you to own parts of many NFTs. A user would build up a 'wallet'/portfolio of NFTs.
This project would explore 2 phases, where 1 lays the ground work for 2.
Phase 1
1a. How shared ownership should be experience most effectively, design and UI
1b. Design a collaboration process resulting in shared ownership that can be translated into an algorithm which can be repeated at scale
UX/UI Designer & Developer: $20.000
Phase 2
2a. A prototype to mint an NFT for each guide
2b Combining the collaboration process with awarding fractal ownership of an NFT
Design & development: $20.000
Project Management: $10.000
Total: $50.000
Success after:
3 Months: Shared ownership design & experience, and a prototype of the contribution process that results in co-ownership
6 Months: Test the collaboration process at scale, and build a working prototype to mint a guide as an NFT and award ownership based on the contribution process.
12 months: Phase 2 of the project?
If there is time & budget left we would also like to explore the next phases in the project, such a as how NFT ownership could also lead to financial rewards. Next steps following this prototype could be connecting a KYC, testing the prototype at scale, integrate with a wallet, and making it available to all users.
Why we need a different kind of space to share knowledge? There are places online where people share knowledge, but these assume a question always has the same answer (wikipedia/wikihow), it's cloudy where knowledge comes from or repetitive (forums), limited in scope and application (not contextual), and/or don't reward the contributor (wikihow).
What we think is missing is a place to navigate change together. We think if we can crack the link contributions-recognition - reward while leaving intrinsic motivation intact, open-collaboration could get a serious boost. Doing this project openly here and with the community allows us to share our experience with others so they can build on it and get a head start.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also liked this proposal: https://cardano.ideascale.com/...
Problem statement :
Encouraging meaningful participation requires experimenting with different approaches to determine the best way to engage the community.
Describe your solution to the problem
Experiment with NFTs as rewards for participation within Catalyst School to determine their effectiveness to increase engagement
Relevant experience
Veteran advisors and proposal mentors, education professionals, very active Catalyst community members since early Funds and more.
Website/GitHub repository (not required) https://linktr.ee/CatalystSchool
Detailed plan (not required) - Fill in here any additional details
This is a side proposal to the Catalyst School - https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/dtd/The-Catalyst-School/367842-48088
What is the Catalyst School?
The Catalyst School is a place to enhance the impact of Catalyst as a whole by improving the contribution of all its different players and roles.
We help onboarding and help improving the skills of:
Our main proposal in Fund 5, with more details about the scope and goals of the Catalyst School, can be check here: https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/dtd/The-Catalyst-School/367842-48088
During Fund 6, the Catalyst School has already helped onboarding more then 200 new Catalyst members in our live sessions and platforms (Telegram, Discord, YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIPvRvMoxhmHLUuPPcsMmmg ).
Overview
There are plenty of ways to explore for trying to increase participation and engagement within the Project Catalyst community. Experimenting with different types of solutions will help highlight what the community values and give support to using effective solutions that drive the participation and engagement the ecosystem needs to thrive.
NFTs have proved increasingly popular across the whole of the crypto market. Collectibles of NFT art pieces started a large movement in the crypto space. NFTs are effective for scarcity, being a verifiably owned asset and can be used as a potential reward or gift for someone's contributions or participation within a community.
As part of the Catalyst School we want to experiment with NFTs as rewards to determine their effectiveness to help encourage meaningful participation within Catalyst School.
If successful the Catalyst School would then look at taking this approach and applying it to Project Catalyst itself so that as a community we can increase participation and create an even more engaging experience and an increased sense of belonging within the community.
Objectives
Initial NFT ideas
The following are some initial NFT ideas we are considering to use within the Catalyst School:
Other potential NFT ideas
The following ideas are ones that require more reflection and time. We may use them alongside of or instead of some of the initial NFT ideas if we believe they may be more impactful:
Future scope
If the NFT ideas are successful within Catalyst School we would look at exploring the following areas to produce some NFTs as a reward. We would be looking to help Project Catalyst and helping with the following type of participation and engagement:
Proposers
Community advisors
Voters
Auditability
Development roadmap & milestones
1 month after funded:
2 months after funded:
3 months after funded:
KPIs
Budget
The Team
We believe that collaboration is the key for the success of Catalyst… and it couldn't be different with this project!
We are a group of 11 people of diverse backgrounds, but two common passions: Catalyst and education.
Go on and get to know our team:
.
Requested funds in USD 5000
Proposals that haven't indicated that they have included all items in the checklist by end of proposal Finalize stage, will not be eligible for voting and will be archived. Received emails from communications@iohk.io, Submitted this proposal to only one challenge, Included identifying information about all proposers, How my proposal impacts the challenge metrics, How I address the challenge question, Definition of success after 3, 6 and 12 months, Broken down my budget requirements, Defined expected public launch date.
Which of these definitions apply to you? Entrepreneur