Every business is, willingly or unwillingly, a competitor on a software playing field, no matter which sector it's in. You're competing against platforms like Uber in transportation, Google in automotive, Airbnb in hospitality, LinkedIn in recruiting, Netflix in television, and the list goes on. In a world underpinned by ever more powerful, affordable, and public technology platforms, software is still king. And its importance as a source of value will only continue to grow.
You may be thinking: but my company isn't a software company. That may be the case, but the current business environment requires all leaders to view their companies as software businesses - and think like software executives. That doesn't mean that you should stop delivering your current products or services. And it certainly doesn't mean that you should suddenly start selling something labeled "software." Rather, this approach recognizes a fundamental shift in the sources of value creation and competitive advantage toward software.
Companies face major risks if they fail to recognize this new platform-driven context and the different economic rules that govern it. The first step toward thinking like a software executive is to understand that your company has some distinctive knowhow - and that it can be codified. Thinking like a software company starts with basic strategy questions:
For an example, look to Disney World. Long renowned for unmatched guest experiences, the magic had begun to fade for the company in the mid 2000s. Key performance metrics, such as "intent to return," driven by expensive tickets and long lines, were worsening. Disney executives formed an exploratory team to reinvent the vacation experience, known as the Next Generation Experience project. By understanding what Disney did well that others did not, the team envisioned using technology to create personalized visits with less friction: no turnstiles, shorter waits, and less zigzagging through the park. They recognized that Disney could offer all of these features through a software platform, creating a seamless experience for their guests.
Today, guests interact with this platform by wearing an RFID-enabled MagicBand, which serves as a ticket for entry, a store of FastPass ride and dining reservations, a hotel room key, a payment system and more. Disney has reinvented the customer experience by translating what it exclusively knows about park operations into software, substantively enhancing its customer value proposition. Intent to return has improved substantially even as Disney is able to accommodate an additional 5,000 daily visitors.
Software doesn't simply make existing products smarter or existing processes more efficient; it enables new models of delivery, engagement, and innovation that are far more productive and informative than the old. Here are some ways to think more like a software company:
Codify proprietary knowhow and use digital platforms to
scale and monetize your offerings.
The big opportunity
here stems from identifying which of your company's unique
capabilities can be built into a software layer that can then be
made available at scale over digital platforms. For instance,
Nordstrom further enhanced its vaunted customer service by
investing in a new point-of-sale system that integrated with their
customer database, providing salespeople with information such as
purchase histories and interests. The software, called Personal
Book, allows Nordstrom to promote sales, special appearances, and
store events in a more targeted manner.
Delta executives recognized that to improve customer experience while simultaneously striving for operational excellence, the airline had to be able to invest rapidly and independently in new proprietary software applications that built on its passenger service and operational platforms. One such application is Delta's rebooking system that can process thousands of reservations in seconds when an irregular event occurs, allowing passengers to view alternative itineraries on their smartphones.
The strategic importance of the software layer drove Delta's decision to acquire the data and intellectual property rights associated with the platforms - an example of valuable knowhow - from service provider Travelport, allowing it to control these systems. Today, Delta has industry-leading operations in metrics such as on-time arrivals, flight cancellations, and lost bags.
Software platforms have incredibly attractive economics. They amplify the value embedded in the software layer by making it easier to increase reach and scope. They support profitable growth: a business can deliver margins that increase with scale as it adds each new user to the platform at modest incremental cost. They can integrate rather than overhaul previously disparate systems. When modular in design, they adapt easily for different markets and can evolve over time.
An important consequence of the platform economy is that, other things being equal, bigger players often do better than smaller ones. When a larger business invests in a software platform, the gains accrue from a greater number of customers, employees, or production units, which means that it can justify an investment when a smaller competitor cannot. Delta, by leveraging its software capabilities across more customers, employees, and flights, achieves a higher return than a smaller competitor would from the same outlay. This means smaller businesses need to build their software platforms for scale right from the start. Since scaling quickly is tough, a smaller business may need to create partnerships or networks to help them grow. Either way, scale becomes a critical part of how companies employ software thinking. Leverage scale if you have it; build for scale if you don't.
Rethink the role of partnerships in your business
model.
Digital technologies aren't just tools of production to improve
existing processes; they are also instruments of coordination,
making it easier to collaborate with partners. Adopting a software
mentality should include rethinking your business model to include
partnerships with others who can help form richer ecosystems,
generate network effects, and improve your overall value
proposition. But it also means evaluating whether you may be better
served by bringing outsourced capabilities back in-house.
Pratt & Whitney has partnered with IBM to enhance its engine management offering. It is applying knowhow from its defense business, where there is high demand for stringent engine monitoring, to its commercial engines business, where it is offering to improve airline fleet operations. To do so, it is complementing its own assets (engines) and domain expertise with IBM's rich portfolio of software (data and analytics) assets.
Faced with a swiftly changing auto industry, General Motors has placed multiple bets in a similar way. It purchased Cruise Automation, a startup developing self-driving software, for over $1 billion. GM executives initially considered a partnership but quickly recognized that self-driving knowhow was a necessary core competence. A future of self-driving cars and ridesharing also requires new ways of thinking about how today's owner-driver model will evolve. So GM developed a strategic alliance with ridesharing platform provider Lyft (including a $500 million investment). GM will place its cars in transportation hubs for use by Lyft drivers. In the future, GM plans to locate its self-driving cars in these hubs. Beyond providing GM with entry into the ridesharing market, the partnership provides GM with knowhow about this evolving marketplace.
This type of thinking doesn't always mean gaining a partner - it can sometimes mean losing one. As we saw earlier, Delta Airlines reversed the industry's traditional shared software model by bringing the intellectual property and data underlying its reservations and operations systems in-house. It decided that it should own this essential knowhow rather than partner for it.
There isn't a single answer to the question of whether your company should partner or whether it should build its own new technologies. The best approach will depend on factors such as industry, scale, existing capabilities, and the nature of competition.
Build an adaptive organization with the right leadership structure. The last, and crucial, part of any transition to software thinking is the management approach to such a change. With their focus on process and routine, the organization structures that were built to manage scale in the industrial age no longer work as well. Businesses must be redesigned to reflect the mechanisms of value creation in a software-driven world: knowhow, innovation, and adaptation. This shift in emphasis requires a corresponding shift in organization structure that is matched to the new values. Perhaps most importantly, it demands a leadership structure that can drive digital innovation.
Consider GE. It is a digital pioneer, actively reinventing itself. It has adopted a software mindset, aiming to become both a platform company and an applications company. GE is building an innovative organizational model suited to its new vision, encouraging digital innovation in its business units while capturing the benefits of scale. It created the new position of Chief Digital Officer (CDO) for the company, who also leads GE Digital, a new division. The CDO is responsible for building new company-wide software capabilities and partnering with the units to exploit their domain-specific knowhow. To facilitate digital innovation and collaboration, GE has also hired CDOs for each of its business units, who report to both the company CDO and the CEO of the unit.
GE CEO Jeff Immelt's advice to all CEOs is: "This [digitization] is going to be the most important thing that you are going to work on at least in this era…You give up your latitude at your own peril."
It's what companies can reimagine with software that creates the real opportunities (and, inevitably, threats). To succeed at digitization, executives must view their businesses as software companies.
---------------