Case Study # 1: Sara MacRae, Manager of Climate and Energy, Dufferin County, Upper- and Lower-Tier Collaboration on Climate Action
Climate action in two-tier systems is inherently interdependent:
- Upper tiers: funding, coordination, program design
- Lower tiers: implementation, permitting, community engagement
Without coordination:
- Projects stalls, Funding opportunities are missed, and Efforts remain fragmented
Core Approach:
- County leads: Program design, Funding applications, Administration
- Local municipalities: Implement where jurisdiction applies
Examples of Success:
- EV Charging Network
- Dufferin County aggregated demand to meet federal funding thresholds
- Delivered 24 chargers across municipalities
- Better Homes Retrofit Program (LIC/PACE)
- County manages financing and administration
- Municipalities enable via bylaws and tax collection mechanism
Importance:
- Enables small/rural municipalities to participate in programs otherwise out of reach
- Reduces administrative burden and duplication
- Accelerates implementation timelines
Key Success Factors:
- Early and ongoing collaboration
- Clear division of roles
- Centralized "heavy lifting" at upper tier
- Relationship-building
Case Study # 2: Grey County, Linda Swanston, Climate Change Initiatives Manager, Grey County and Emily McKague, Grey Agricultural Services, Environmental Acres Program
Program Overview:
- Micro-grant program (up to $3,000 per project)
- Supports farmers in testing new sustainable practices
- Delivered in partnership with Grey Ag Services
- Builds on models from Wellington and Dufferin
Key Outcomes:
- 19 projects across 440+ acres
- Strong uptake across diverse farm types
- Expansion of successful practices beyond initial trials
Types of Projects
- Cover cropping and extended grazing
- Reduced tillage approaches
- Soil health improvement techniques
- Crop experimentation (e.g., no-till establishment)
Benefits
For municipalities:
- Stronger relationships with agricultural community
- Better understanding of on-the-ground challenges
- Integration of agriculture into climate planning
For farmers:
- Reduced risk in trying new practices
- Access to funding and technical support
- Peer learning and networking opportunities
For broader community:
- Increased visibility of sustainable agriculture
- Public support for climate investments
Success Factors
- Trusted intermediary (e.g., agricultural service organizations)
- Low barriers to participation
- Peer learning and networking
- Communication (events, reports, videos)